Professional substitute claims need evidence that fits the professional context. This executive brief gives leaders the control questions behind the DoNotPay FTC matter.

Professional substitute claims need evidence that fits the professional context. This executive brief gives leaders the control questions behind the DoNotPay FTC matter.

The FTC alleged that DoNotPay marketed its service as the world's first robot lawyer without evidence adequate to support human lawyer level claims. The final order required monetary relief, consumer notice, and restrictions on specified future claims.

A no-bias claim is a performance claim the moment a customer can rely on it. This executive brief gives leaders the control questions behind the IntelliVision FTC matter.

The FTC alleged IntelliVision made unsubstantiated claims about facial recognition accuracy, bias, training-data scale, and anti-spoofing performance. The matter resolved through a final order with no admission and no monetary relief. The governance lesson: a fairness claim needs group-level evidence before it reaches a customer.

A no-bias claim is a performance claim the moment a customer can rely on it. This executive brief gives leaders the control questions behind the IntelliVision FTC matter.

The FTC alleged unsupported claims about an AI powered weapons detection screening product used in schools and other high volume venues. The case resolved through a stipulated order. Evolv did not admit wrongdoing, and the governance lesson is clear: safety claims need evidence before customers rely on them.

A safety claim is not normal marketing copy when customers may adjust staffing, searches, escalation, or backup safeguards because of it. This executive brief gives leaders the control questions behind the Evolv FTC matter.

The FTC alleged unsupported claims about an AI powered weapons detection screening product used in schools and other high volume venues. The case resolved through a stipulated order. Evolv did not admit wrongdoing, and the governance lesson is clear: safety claims need evidence before customers rely on them.