A biometric match does not lower the governance bar. This executive brief gives leaders the Rite Aid control questions for match verification, employee limits, and stop conditions.

The SafeRent case shows why vendor scores need validation for the exact population and decision where they are used. The lesson reaches any consequential eligibility decision. Tags

Professional substitute claims need evidence that fits the professional context. This executive brief gives leaders the control questions behind the DoNotPay FTC matter.

A no-bias claim is a performance claim the moment a customer can rely on it. This executive brief gives leaders the control questions behind the IntelliVision FTC matter.

The FTC alleged unsupported claims about an AI powered weapons detection screening product used in schools and other high volume venues. The case resolved through a stipulated order. Evolv did not admit wrongdoing, and the governance lesson is clear: safety claims need evidence before customers rely on them.

A federal sanctions opinion showed what happens when generated legal authority reaches a court filing without independent verification. Mata v. Avianca remains a clean governance lesson: AI output is not evidence until it is checked against the source.